Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Nos parts vs repro parts

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Monza, Italy
    Posts
    1,361

    Nos parts vs repro parts

    There is a big debate between my friends about Nos vs Repro parts.

    This is one little but very clear example: repro in the L , nos on the R:

    Name:  IMG-20130904-04235.jpg
Views: 370
Size:  67.8 KB

    Name:  IMG-20130904-04236.jpg
Views: 390
Size:  63.4 KB

    Name:  IMG-20130904-04237.jpg
Views: 384
Size:  83.6 KB

    Name:  IMG-20130904-04240.jpg
Views: 388
Size:  52.2 KB

    i ask to myself and to you: Why??

    why to work in so bad way?


    Registry Member #1414
    NOSGRUPPE

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sunny Southern France
    Posts
    608
    Dimensional issues have no excuses looks like the repro is a bit shorter?

    Leather grain difference is another debate. Injection plastic molds are not that easy to produce, especially with this kind of texture. Electro erosion is probably the way to go. In this case I bet this was the only pattern availables, and they went this route.

    At the end, the cost is the same, its a matter of attention to details, and the way you order/specify your parts. In the best case, you have what you asked, and only what you asked.

    I think you made the experience with your roof repop, the manufacturer had probably something pretty close, but not exactly the same pattern, holes dimensions... And you probably had to fight quite a bit to obtain what you wanted exactly, in term of quality, color, holes patterns... Which also probably nded by a special tool made to match the original (unless you were lucky enough to find off the shelf fabric with same patterns)

    I think it's the same here, with the comissioner of this repop being less attentive to details than you were...

    Just my 0.02cents, and a little experience of my own

    Olivier

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by andrea70 View Post

    i ask to myself and to you: Why??

    why to work in so bad way?


    I think that reproduction looks pretty decent considering it is sold for a classic car that was discontinued 40 years ago. The grain is clearly different but it looks good to me otherwise.

    Maybe I am missing something…?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Monza, Italy
    Posts
    1,361
    olivier you understand the point

    to make something wrong or correct has the same cost.

    it's only a matter of details, passion, and focus on the goal: a PERFECT repro, not only a crappy piece of plastic!

    i pay lots of thousand of euros for a high level restored 911, and i claim the top quality on EVERY SINGLE piece!

    bah... that's why i hope to find nos parts for long time again.....

    yes, it's more expensive, but the RIGHT thing, passed by Porsche quality assurance department.

    or

    only perfect high level repro! i spent a huge amount of money to make the correct metal die to have the correct hole dimensions, and i searched for an excellent italian producer to have the correct material....

    if you don't have passion and skill in this area, it is better to make another job.

    i saw the last repro parts from porsche... my God.....
    Registry Member #1414
    NOSGRUPPE

  5. #5
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184
    I make teeth for a living, how would you like one the wrong shade and obviously too large? If your going to make it...make it perfect! There is no reason to compromise other than laziness! That's the only way I can keep work coming in...

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741

  6. #6
    Senior Member Per Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Avon Lake, Ohio
    Posts
    272
    Here are three of this particular part. 1 is an original from a 55k mile car. 1 is the current Porsche offering at $39something. 1 is what we offer for $8.50.

    Which is which?

    Name:  photo-3.jpg
Views: 223
Size:  79.6 KB
    Name:  photo-2.jpg
Views: 219
Size:  72.6 KB

    The used one is easy to tell--it's shiny where your hand rubs from the knob.

    The other two...not so easy.

    Here's a hint, it's not what you think. Porsche changes vendors continuously, just like we do, trying to find the best parts. Sometimes their vendors are our vendors and sometimes we are their vendors. Confused yet?
    Last edited by Per Schroeder; 09-05-2013 at 07:47 AM.
    Per Schroeder

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sunny Southern France
    Posts
    608
    Difficult to tell with pics quality, but looks like none of the repops has the same leather grain!

    Are you producing these parts? Lets tell us more HOW you did to replicate this grain as close as possible! Should be very interesting

    3d scan? Off the shels pattern?
    I know this can be a nightmare for cars manufacturers to obtain a good grain, and that they have full dedicated teams for this stuff

    Olivier

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-13-2012, 09:44 AM
  2. WTB ST repro (or used) parts(alu doors skin , rear alu deck lid)
    By deudeuesse in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2012, 03:44 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-29-2012, 04:43 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2010, 01:00 PM
  5. More Early Repro Parts
    By JPlonghood in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 02:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.