Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Tube vs. tubeless tire...question please

  1. #1

    Tube vs. tubeless tire...question please

    The spare included in my 73 S is a Dunlop SP57 tube tire...I eventually want to display that tire as my spare on the original Fuch 6X15 and am curious what it is about the tire construction that required the use of a tube, i.e. would it not properly seal if I did not use a tube? Thanks!

  2. #2
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    They came with tubes, but I converted mine to tubeless by changing the valve. You can go either way.
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  3. #3
    Surely the SP57 is a Tubeless Tyre as it is radial construction with Rayon belting.

    They may have been supplied with tubes when new as some 911 Rims don't have the safety beads t hold a 'soft' tubeless tyre to the rim.

    If you look inside a modern radial you find very rough surfaces which are incompatible with tubes and cause chafing of the surfaces and overheating.

    Tube tyres used to have very smooth surfaces and were 'powdered' with French Chalk to minimise friction.

  4. #4
    Senior Member RennTyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by chris_seven View Post
    Surely the SP57 is a Tubeless Tyre as it is radial construction with Rayon belting.

    They may have been supplied with tubes when new as some 911 Rims don't have the safety beads t hold a 'soft' tubeless tyre to the rim.

    If you look inside a modern radial you find very rough surfaces which are incompatible with tubes and cause chafing of the surfaces and overheating.

    Tube tyres used to have very smooth surfaces and were 'powdered' with French Chalk to minimise friction.
    I've always had a dilemma about running modern radial tyres on an old deep 6 Fuchs rim. Run without inner tube and worry about the lack of a safety bead, or with inner tube and worry about the incompatibility described. Which is less risky? And does the view change between road and track?
    Early 911S Registry #888

  5. #5
    Senior Member Harvey Weidman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oroville, CA
    Posts
    1,850
    We have been running (on the street and track) early 6s...and late "flat" 6s tubeless since 73.
    BTW, the safety beads are not related to tubeless tires. They were developed for a early version of run flat...long before tubeless tires were available.
    Even today, there are wheels that don't have safety beads.
    The main difference on the early 6 is the stem hole. The stem hole should be modified for tubeless snap in stems. The late "flat" 6 doesn't need the mod.
    However, there are tires that are tube type that won't hold air when run tubeless...
    H

  6. #6
    I believe that Porsche started to use this feature on steel rims in 1968 and alloy rims in 1972.

    Goodrich launched the first Tubeless tyre in 1947 and they were in very common use by the mid-50's.

    I thought wheels with 'safety beads' were introduced in the US from around 1950.

    The first Run Flats were introduced in about 1967.

    Having had tyres come off rims on rally cars I always worry about the lack of this bead on early wheels with 'sticky' tyres.

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Dunlop SP 57 tire with tube
    By George A in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 03:07 PM
  2. Air Cleaner Air Tube Question
    By METAVINYL in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-08-2012, 10:02 PM
  3. torsion tube question
    By freezing14 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 06:31 PM
  4. tubeless valve stem in deep 6 question
    By john walker in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-18-2007, 03:29 PM
  5. 67 S tire question - tube or tubeless
    By Cornpanzer in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 05:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.