Page 5 of 33 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 322

Thread: 964 euro carrera cup cars

  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Yep, it is. I am presuming this is the class that Porsche homologated the 964 RS for. (Large volume GT) Someone gave the Base car the nickname NGT? It makes sense. Maybe Bob knows the answer.
    Last edited by MarkH; 09-09-2014 at 06:40 AM.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Vienna, St. Gallen, Stuttgart
    Posts
    386
    So, what is the difference between an N-GT "base" car and an M003? Have you ever seen any documentation on that variation?

    If we define a new dinosaur we should at least find some bones, shouldn't we?
    Keep up the speed!

    Anatol

    '68 911S coupe
    '92 964 RS NGT
    '09 987S Boxster

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Yes, I agree. Steve told me this week that he has 10 years worth of information on these cars. He said he would go through it after the holidays and let me know. Do you have anything you can share about yours?

    Mark

  4. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    This is what we are looking for only 20 years later! The method of classification the Factory used in 1973 is nearly the same as Bob Gagnon's article. That's why I think he is right. Also notice that the Factory does not use the names Homologation or RSH when describing the Base car, Lightweight when describing the M471,Touring the M472 or RSR the M491. These terms came from somewhere else. I am nearly certain that Olaf Lang was the first to use the term "Homologation Car" when describing the Base RS. My guess is the N-GT name came about in a similar way.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Vienna, St. Gallen, Stuttgart
    Posts
    386
    Before wrong concepts are spread, I would like to prove that M001 is the base car, M002 the touring version and M003 the version with NGT race package. These are official designations and not nick names awarded by the public.

    The source I can offer you is the technical service documentation published in 1992:



    On the following page the three official versions are differentiated as regards to the transmission. The names "Basis" (i.e. "base"), "Touring" and "Sport/NGT" are used:



    On the next page the different options for each variation are listed. Again the terms "Basis", "Touring" and "Race/M003" are used:



    These official documents clearly prove that there is no such car as a base car from which all the other variants are derived. The base car is a variant in itself, namely the M001 car with carpets and leather bucket seats as opposed to the M002 Touring with full appointment and the M003 Race/NGT without carpets but with full welded cage and cloth bucket seats.
    Keep up the speed!

    Anatol

    '68 911S coupe
    '92 964 RS NGT
    '09 987S Boxster

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Thanks Anatol. That's great. Appreciate you taking the time to do this.

    It will be nice to have this as a reference.

    Mark

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Vienna, St. Gallen, Stuttgart
    Posts
    386
    Mark, you are welcome!

    Merry Christmas to all of you!
    Keep up the speed!

    Anatol

    '68 911S coupe
    '92 964 RS NGT
    '09 987S Boxster

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Thought I would post my Speedline story that I mentioned in an earlier post. I know this will be interesting to maybe two and a half people but it was helpful to me as I try to put a set together for my 92 Cup. The 8 x 18" fronts were also used on the 3.6 Turbo so they are somewhat available but the 9.5 x 18 rears were exclusive to the RS Cups. I have found one but still need another. Then I find out from Speedline guru Jim Dorociak that there are two versions. So now trying to find a rare matching wheel got twice as hard. Even though they are different they have the same part number.

    Here is the early version. The spokes are noticeably lighter than the later version when viewed from the back. Jim said this version was prone to cracking. Photos 4,5 and 6 are the later version.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by MarkH; 09-20-2016 at 07:16 AM.

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Later version.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Another apparent contradiction........

    Several references state that when the 964 Cup was used in the first Supercup in 1993 a second door beam was required. (like in the yellow car) So I'm watching the Monaco Supercup race and here's Walter Rohl sitting in his car.

    Mark
    Attached Images Attached Images

Similar Threads

  1. Pros & Cons of Euro Cars
    By Michael Meldrum in forum General Info
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 01-17-2018, 01:53 PM
  2. Euro Carrera
    By jaudette3 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-06-2009, 09:48 AM
  3. Impact of rising EURO on early cars.
    By Macroni in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-02-2009, 07:03 AM
  4. 1986 911 Carrera/Euro 74 Porsche Carrera RS (clone) on the Bird
    By byron in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 10:25 AM
  5. FS Euro Carrera $7.5K
    By EARLY911ZOO in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-23-2008, 07:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.