Page 98 of 111 FirstFirst ... 488896979899100108 ... LastLast
Results 971 to 980 of 1105

Thread: Ultimate ST thread

  1. #971
    I would say that M494 was a transcription error, although I have found it in the document that accompanies the new S/T and also in a previous article by someone from Porsche. If I remember correctly, M494 was Turbolook for the cars of later years, so in my opinion, M494 doesn't have much relevance.
    +I thought so, now I don't remember where that information came from or if I'm mixing it up, but at the time, I couldn't find anything regarding 494 for these ciches

  2. #972
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,829
    Matt
    i have never heard of that option and cant see it on the Fahrzeug-Auftrag sheets that I have

    However there is a Z code on the order sheet for 230 0495: Z-Antrag Nr 827

    My understanding is that all the details for what was contained in the Z-Antrag Nrs, KD-Rech Nrs, Moto.Frisiert nrs, etc that were stored in the old customer competition shop at the factory were destroyed sometime in the late 70's or 80's and all of the information lost. They were supposed to detail the type of tuning of competition engines including parts and processes used like honing and polishing parts, standard competition enhancements to both engines and the rest of the cars as well as specific competition parts lists for "packages" for factory installed customer competition cars

    230 0550 has a Z-Antrag Nr 839 on its Fahrzeug-Auftrag so they appear to be specific to a car. However, from what I understand, it is likely that ALL of the special items for each of those cars would have been detailed on the Z-Antrag file note and likely NOT be a special M number

    I dont have the specific Z number for any other of the 21 cars BUT I do have data that suggests there was one for 495, 538, and 550, but no similar notations for any of the other ones. 538 was the Keyser car used in the Targa Florio so also a "rally car" so MAYBE that had something to do with "rally options"?

    Baudett
    your post raised too many issues for me to address at this time of night here so i will look at them and see what I can reply to
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  3. #973
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Bicester, UK
    Posts
    358
    Hi Baudett

    If that’s the case (and I don’t disagree with you because I Googled M494 and found the same totally different reference), do we think that all the rally mods for the ‘72 MY 911 S with M491 option (I think that has to be the correct factory description for the 21) were selected from a Sports Department list, much like the kits from 1970-‘71?

    On a separate note, this factory press release to the dealers in December 1971 provides some useful insight into how the factory was promoting the car for the 1972 season:

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nswua...3edpwtv05&dl=0

    Matt
    Last edited by matteo68; 06-10-2024 at 06:45 AM. Reason: Correction
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)
    Looking for 915/00 gearbox #7120022

  4. #974
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,829
    Matt
    Thanks the English part will help answer Baudett's questions about what was in M471 (first page) and save me finding my copy.
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  5. #975
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Bicester, UK
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by HughH View Post
    Matt
    i have never heard of that option and cant see it on the Fahrzeug-Auftrag sheets that I have

    However there is a Z code on the order sheet for 230 0495: Z-Antrag Nr 827

    My understanding is that all the details for what was contained in the Z-Antrag Nrs, KD-Rech Nrs, Moto.Frisiert nrs, etc that were stored in the old customer competition shop at the factory were destroyed sometime in the late 70's or 80's and all of the information lost. They were supposed to detail the type of tuning of competition engines including parts and processes used like honing and polishing parts, standard competition enhancements to both engines and the rest of the cars as well as specific competition parts lists for "packages" for factory installed customer competition cars

    230 0550 has a Z-Antrag Nr 839 on its Fahrzeug-Auftrag so they appear to be specific to a car. However, from what I understand, it is likely that ALL of the special items for each of those cars would have been detailed on the Z-Antrag file note and likely NOT be a special M number

    I dont have the specific Z number for any other of the 21 cars BUT I do have data that suggests there was one for 495, 538, and 550, but no similar notations for any of the other ones. 538 was the Keyser car used in the Targa Florio so also a "rally car" so MAYBE that had something to do with "rally options"?

    Baudett
    your post raised too many issues for me to address at this time of night here so i will look at them and see what I can reply to
    Hi Hugh
    Yes I can see those Z-Anfrag (Z -Special Request - like Sonderwunsch?) numbers on my copies of those FZGs too. I will see if I can get my contact to look through the FZGs for the other 18 to see if any of those also show Z-Anfrag numbers as well, not that they will help us very much!…

    Matt
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)
    Looking for 915/00 gearbox #7120022

  6. #976
    Quote Originally Posted by _gonbau View Post


    If this is a 100% factory S/T, does that mean that the factory S/Ts were later sent to the sports department to finish equipping the necessary items? It's evident that it lacks the electrical cut-off, but the hole has been made (the two small ones and one large one), so it's clear that the installation was going to be done. Would this installation not be listed on the vehicle's construction sheet, for example, or would it be listed? I understand that it would be since you can see that some metalwork has been done there. Therefore, the factory made the S/Ts but didn't fully equip them even though they were "new" and coming out of the factory... Is this correct?
    Yes, thatīs very possible that the sports department finished the car with all details.
    From my understanding, the -72 small series of 21+ identical cars were made right from the beginning on the build sheet in the body shop.
    Thereīs metalwork on the body you can only do when the body/shell is being built up and not like prior ST:s that most likely got an "body in white"
    from Karmann and they started to modify it in the racing department.
    An example is the covered fuel hole that goes through the front frame. On 2.5 factory ST/SR:s itīs spot welded and thatīs only possible before the frame is put
    together. Another example is the small brackets holding the oil breather bottle in the engine compartment. Itīs also spot welded from two sides, and it makes no sense
    doing that when all other panels are there or when the engine is there and the body is painted.

    BTW, some great posts by HughH

  7. #977
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Bicester, UK
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by Nimba View Post
    Yes, thatīs very possible that the sports department finished the car with all details.
    From my understanding, the -72 small series of 21+ identical cars were made right from the beginning on the build sheet in the body shop.
    Thereīs metalwork on the body you can only do when the body/shell is being built up and not like prior ST:s that most likely got an "body in white"
    from Karmann and they started to modify it in the racing department.
    An example is the covered fuel hole that goes through the front frame. On 2.5 factory ST/SR:s itīs spot welded and thatīs only possible before the frame is put
    together. Another example is the small brackets holding the oil breather bottle in the engine compartment. Itīs also spot welded from two sides, and it makes no sense
    doing that when all other panels are there or when the engine is there and the body is painted.

    BTW, some great posts by HughH

    Do you have any clear images of the breather bottle retaining brackets at all?

    Also it is not entirely clear whether the factory spot welded the fuel flap shut (if this is what you are referring to) on all the 21 M491 S’s as it was present on at least three (0934, 0955 and 0983 - see below)

    Name:  911 230 0934 (4) burlington centennial mosport.jpeg
Views: 1600
Size:  56.5 KB
    0934

    Name:  1018484092-col-19720425-ec 1972 monza 1000kms 044.jpg
Views: 1515
Size:  138.7 KB
    Name:  911 230 0955 (18) le mans 24hrs (11-06-72).jpeg
Views: 1413
Size:  93.5 KB
    0955

    Name:  50e0d129-5d39-40ba-9a40-ca8f0a5f2b25.jpg
Views: 1407
Size:  48.2 KB
    0983

    Matt
    Last edited by matteo68; 06-10-2024 at 09:10 AM.
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)
    Looking for 915/00 gearbox #7120022

  8. #978
    Quote Originally Posted by matteo68 View Post
    Do you have any clear images of the breather bottle retaining brackets at all?

    Also it is not entirely clear whether the factory spot welded the fuel flap shut (if this is what you are referring to) on all the 21 M491 S’s as it was present on at least three (0934, 0955 and 0983 - see below)

    Name:  911 230 0934 (4) burlington centennial mosport.jpeg
Views: 1600
Size:  56.5 KB
    0934

    Name:  1018484092-col-19720425-ec 1972 monza 1000kms 044.jpg
Views: 1515
Size:  138.7 KB
    Name:  911 230 0955 (18) le mans 24hrs (11-06-72).jpeg
Views: 1413
Size:  93.5 KB
    0955

    Name:  50e0d129-5d39-40ba-9a40-ca8f0a5f2b25.jpg
Views: 1407
Size:  48.2 KB
    0983

    Matt
    Referring to the inner wing where the fuel filler pipe would have gone to on a standard fuel tank,rsr also.

  9. #979
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Location
    Le Mans
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by matteo68 View Post

    Name:  50e0d129-5d39-40ba-9a40-ca8f0a5f2b25.jpg
Views: 1407
Size:  48.2 KB
    0983
    Oh, that's the picture I found on the internet a few month ago ; )

    Here is a picture of 0955 at Le Mans 1972 :

    Name:  429750185_2079612622398420_9107863314412940565_n.jpg
Views: 1553
Size:  89.3 KB


    Thank you Hugh, Matteo for your findings and knowledge, that's really interesting to read and to think about.
    Last edited by Leirbag; 09-04-2024 at 03:21 AM.

  10. #980
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Nimba View Post
    Yes, thatīs very possible that the sports department finished the car with all details.
    From my understanding, the -72 small series of 21+ identical cars were made right from the beginning on the build sheet in the body shop.
    Thereīs metalwork on the body you can only do when the body/shell is being built up and not like prior ST:s that most likely got an "body in white"
    from Karmann and they started to modify it in the racing department.
    An example is the covered fuel hole that goes through the front frame. On 2.5 factory ST/SR:s itīs spot welded and thatīs only possible before the frame is put
    together. Another example is the small brackets holding the oil breather bottle in the engine compartment. Itīs also spot welded from two sides, and it makes no sense
    doing that when all other panels are there or when the engine is there and the body is painted.

    BTW, some great posts by HughH

    My understanding i that all of the 21 cars in 1972 were built completely from scratch in the customer race department (unlike in previous years and possibly for the 1972 factory "ST's" where they started life on the normal production line) This even extended to the vin stamping of the 21 cars which was done on a totally separate machine to the production line vins). this is another unique feature of these 21 cars
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

Similar Threads

  1. The Ultimate T/R Thread...
    By bob tilton in forum General Info
    Replies: 187
    Last Post: 03-09-2025, 05:52 AM
  2. Ultimate R thread
    By Original Poster in forum General Info
    Replies: 700
    Last Post: 07-10-2024, 08:20 AM
  3. Ultimate Photography knowledge thread
    By Original Poster in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 10:03 AM
  4. Ultimate sport seat thread?
    By advtracing in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2010, 08:47 PM
  5. Ultimate Early Car Airconditioning Thread
    By CamBiscuit in forum General Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-19-2010, 03:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.