Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.
. It will also be a bit nicer once the 2.8 gets installed. The titanium rods from crower finally made it in and boy are they light. 341g compaired to the stock 722. Almost too pretty to install...
a SWB, but after staring at lots of pictures I am coming to an opinion that the SC flares 'work' nicer with the narrow lips of the front fenders. Other than the fat, flat lip of the RS flare is there any other shape difference between the SC and RS flares? When this process is done is the sheet metal butt welded or does one piece need to have a lip crimped into it? I would assume when done correctly, there is almost no filler.
Reply With Quote