Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: '64 911 . . . .

  1. 05-05-2025, 05:20 AM #11
    Jesse-911E 1969
    Jesse-911E 1969 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Netherlands, Leiden
    Posts
    2,477
    Quote Originally Posted by guidoquiram View Post
    ... and apparently matching ...
    Engine number looks authentic to me:

    Engine.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-06-2025, 02:26 AM #12
    68S_SK2
    68S_SK2 is offline
    Senior Member 68S_SK2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    639
    But transmission stamping??? I don't think so.
    Claudius

    Trans.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-06-2025, 08:51 AM #13
    davep
    davep is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,385
    How do these compare:
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-06-2025, 09:13 AM #14
    mike66
    mike66 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Zurich/Switzerland
    Posts
    314
    100% not original stamping, not even close...
    Mike, member #841
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-06-2025, 09:15 AM #15
    mike66
    mike66 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Zurich/Switzerland
    Posts
    314
    but 129k looks pretty fair to me. What do you guys think?
    Mike, member #841
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 05-06-2025, 10:35 AM #16
    Jesse-911E 1969
    Jesse-911E 1969 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Netherlands, Leiden
    Posts
    2,477
    Looks like 100419 is stamped more to the left?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-06-2025, 10:39 AM #17
    moito
    moito is offline
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,798
    looks like the right front has been involved in something
    membership#2778

    300096
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...?117979-300096
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owI1QBHhbS0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i05gKtHWjGY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTrvIZxk9xY
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 05-06-2025, 12:27 PM #18
    John Straub
    John Straub is offline
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,290
    Not bad, pretty complete, except for the gas tank. Not sure about the floors with shiny paint.

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-06-2025, 12:42 PM #19
    ajwans
    ajwans is offline
    Restoration newbie.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    1,507
    Seems like the real issue is the file marks. Interestingly, these early boxes seem to be stamped from the back toward the front while later 901 I've observed they stamped front to back.

    Maybe the beer dispenser moved to the other end of the transaxle building room.

    andy
    67S in pieces
    EarlyS: 1358
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. Yesterday, 07:03 PM #20
    Nickelplated5s
    Nickelplated5s is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    270
    419 is a restamp. You can tell from the font size and the grind mark difference from 476. Now for the gurus, what did my 901/10 19767 come out of? Pretty sure a 69S.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.