Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Value Question

  1. #1

    Value Question

    What would you think has better future value potential between a 911t with its original engine or a 911s with a non correct engine (2.7)?

    To help clarify I am in the market for a long hood 911 and like most buyers I am searching for the best car that I can find with my limited budget (40k max). My intentions are to enjoy the car and to have a long term project with my two boys. Recently I found a 72 911s with a turbo spoiler, non original front and rear bumpers and a 2.7 engine with the original engine being long gone. I foresee changing the body panels back to stock however I do not think i would take on the expense of purchasing a correct s engine. Now is my money better spent on the most original 911t or e that I can find or is the illustrious s the way to go?

    Lastly, I do not see the car as an investment but it certainly would be nice to break even or as close as possible when the car is sold down the road.

    Thank you
    Last edited by Sundaysunday; 10-28-2013 at 05:33 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member 67er911S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    2,010
    +++ original +++ original +++ original ++++

    please no changings...
    911 S 1967 and ...

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Sundaysunday View Post
    What would you think has better future value potential between a 911t with its original engine or a 911s with a non correct engine (2.7 or 3.0)?

    For sake of the comparison let's assume everything else is equal.

    Thank you
    But I'm sure that everything else is not equal. Year, rust, etc. what does a 911S engine cost outright?
    And the S is certainly worth much more than a T.
    Even an S with a non original but correct engine

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    If everything is equal, the question is pointless.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by gsjohnson View Post
    If everything is equal, the question is pointless.
    You must have become a senior member by the wonderful insight you bring to this forum.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Harvey Weidman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oroville, CA
    Posts
    1,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Sundaysunday View Post
    Lastly, I do not see the car as an investment but it certainly would be nice to break even or as close as possible when the car is sold down the road.

    Thank you
    At the rate the Ss are increasing in value, the S will become an investment and the T if done right will break even or better.
    Buy the best car for the money. If they are the same condition, the S is a better value even with the 2.7. IMHO
    Coming from an enthusiast that is neither an investor or collector.....I just like driving Porsches..
    H

  7. #7
    Restoration newbie.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    1,506
    Welcome to the forum, if you search you'll find plenty of threads going over the topic of value ad infinitum.

    Bottom line, buy what makes you happy. If you want an S buy the S, if you want original buy the T, if you want both then you may have to expand your budget.

    Educate yourself first and be prepared to post lots of detailed photos if you expect an answer more accurate than a guess.

    andy
    67S in pieces
    EarlyS: 1358
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #8
    Senior Member beh911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,620

    Value ad nauseum

    Buy the car that speaks to you. Forget the S v E v T debate and buy the best example requiring the least work that fits in your budget. Then go enjoy it with your kids.

    If I were in the market for another early 911, I would focus on finding an already sorted example and not chase "what might be" in the future. Live in the moment as no one knows what happens next.

    Also. You will spend at least your $40k purchase price of that gold chained S correcting all the gore on it. If your pockets aren't deep and/or your patience is thin, you could become disillusioned and never get to experience one of these cars.

    Good luck in your decision
    1969 S Coupe #761
    Early S Registry #1624

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Sundaysunday View Post
    You must have become a senior member by the wonderful insight you bring to this forum.
    Just here to enlighten the noobies

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-19-2015, 10:54 AM
  2. Question??
    By Minkoff in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2013, 07:34 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2011, 07:15 PM
  4. 69S Man a question about yur Cab
    By tabs52 in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-13-2004, 11:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.