Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 85

Thread: MFI engine hesitation when speed switch/RPM transducer connected

  1. #71
    I would also do two more tests. First I'd remove the wires from the micro switch, make a jumper wire with two alligator clips, cut the wire in the middle and wire in a door bell switch, then attach one end each to the removed micro switch wires. Now you can simulate the micro switch. Second I'd remove the wire to the shut off solenoid, and attach it to a standard test light. Now the solenoid won't work, but you'll know when it gets power. Not sure what you'll find, never know, might lead to something.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  2. #72
    Ok, will do that this WE thanks !

  3. #73
    Senior Member frederik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by tom1394racing View Post
    To be clearer...I would pull the RPM transducer out of the relay panel and wire some direct connections to it. This would include all (4) wires to the RPM tranducer. A good known ground, a wire from the micoswitch, a wire to stop solenoid and the wire from the distributor. This, way you bypass any potential problem in the relay panel. Then try your tests again to see if anything changes.
    With the risk of saying something stupid again... this is not how the transducer is wired up from the diagram. It gets a ground and 12v, input from the distributor, and outputs 12v if the RPM is above 1300. The microswitch lets this go through to the solenoid if the throttle linkage is at idle.

    So: throttle linkage not at idle? Connection to the solenoid is broken by the microswitch, so fuel flow is never stopped.
    Throttle linkage at idle? If RPM is above 1300, the solenoid engages and stops fuel flow. Below 1300, the transducer should output 0v so the solenoid disengages and fuel flow is restored, so the engine won't cut out.

    The problem looks to be that the transducer sometimes outputs 12v even if the RPM is below 1300. Maybe it's faulty, or it could be picking up an unreliable RPM signal somehow. It would be really great if you could hook up a scope to the RPM input.
    1970 2.2S Elfenbeinweiss
    1972 2.4T Targa Aubergine (MFI) [For sale]
    2002 996 TT Midnight Blue
    Member #3833

  4. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by frederik View Post
    With the risk of saying something stupid again... this is not how the transducer is wired up from the diagram. It gets a ground and 12v, input from the distributor, and outputs 12v if the RPM is above 1300. The microswitch lets this go through to the solenoid if the throttle linkage is at idle.

    So: throttle linkage not at idle? Connection to the solenoid is broken by the microswitch, so fuel flow is never stopped.
    Throttle linkage at idle? If RPM is above 1300, the solenoid engages and stops fuel flow. Below 1300, the transducer should output 0v so the solenoid disengages and fuel flow is restored, so the engine won't cut out.

    The problem looks to be that the transducer sometimes outputs 12v even if the RPM is below 1300. Maybe it's faulty, or it could be picking up an unreliable RPM signal somehow. It would be really great if you could hook up a scope to the RPM input.
    Agree with you !
    The wire coming from the transducer and going to the shut off solenoid must go through the microswitch.
    There is no direct connection between the transducer and the solenoid.

  5. #75
    BREAKING NEWS !

    I tested the relay on a 2.4S and another 2.0E....same problem, the new transducer is definitely faulty.

    Porsche will change the transducer to verify if it is an isolated case or if they have a production problem.

    Meantime I'm still waiting for my original rebuild transducer...

  6. #76
    Senior Member frederik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    515
    Awesome, glad the riddle is finally solved!
    1970 2.2S Elfenbeinweiss
    1972 2.4T Targa Aubergine (MFI) [For sale]
    2002 996 TT Midnight Blue
    Member #3833

  7. #77
    Back in post 60 you said it worked fine in another car? I'm still hopeful the transducer is bad however.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  8. #78
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    3,011
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    Back in post 60 you said it worked fine in another car? I'm still hopeful the transducer is bad however.
    I am guessing that the transducer worked fine in the other car because it did not warm up and the idle speed was too high during the test.
    Tom Butler
    1973 RSR Clone
    1970 911E
    914-6 GT Clone in Progress

  9. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    Back in post 60 you said it worked fine in another car? I'm still hopeful the transducer is bad however.
    This is what made me lose 1 month of troubleshooting on my car...

    First, that car was not warmed up and also known to be very very rich at idle, and second we did not check it with a lamp test....bad idea !

    What happened is my mechanic called me to buy my transducer for a 2.4S he was supposed to deliver this week and the transducer was dead on that car.
    So we tested it, this time with the lamp test and we saw the lamp light up at idle..., no engine stall but inconsistent idle.

    Then we tested it on another 2.0E and again 12V was arriving at idle...here's the film :

    https://youtube.com/shorts/exE8z6TnOUc

    Now the interesting question is : is it an isolated bad transducer or do Posche has a production problem on this particular part ?

    Answer by the end of this week !

  10. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by tom1394racing View Post
    I am guessing that the transducer worked fine in the other car because it did not warm up and the idle speed was too high during the test.
    And we did not use a lamp test !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.