Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Is it the color?

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Quote Originally Posted by 91133 View Post
    I think it's sort of between 2 stools
    As in Bristol Stool Chart?

  2. #12
    While I think we will soon be at a place where entry level for a driver level T longhood will be $100k, I don't think we're there yet. The $100k neighborhood is still top of the market for a T, even a mechanically injected 72, so buyers expect an exceptional car. Your car looks very nice, but still has some "needs" to make it right, as it really isn't a hot-rod as is, and some if the needed items make the car look almost unfinished. Step 1: take the car off the market. Step 2: put the trim back on, install the rear seats, add center caps to the wheels, install a stock steering and fix the flabby seats. Step 3: check what has happened during the Monterey auction madness, but be honest with yourself about how your car stacks up. Step 4: Relist the car for sale with a then-current price. Step 5: If you want a top of the market price based, be patient.

  3. #13
    Senior Member sam71TargaS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    229
    This is why I really like this forum, honest feedback and not a lot of BS. I agree with the majority of the comments and will be taking the car off of the market and will be addressing the areas to make it back to stock and some other very minor areas and will re list in September.

    Thanks,
    Sam
    1971 S Targa - Gone
    1970 S Coupe Vintage Racer turned RGruppe - Gone
    1973 T Coupe - Gone
    1972 T Coupe - Gone
    1970 T Coupe - Gone
    1997 993 Coupe - Last of the air cooled

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,721
    Quote Originally Posted by bdladd View Post
    Derek Tam-Scott at themotoringenthusiast.com had this 72 Sepia T for sale a few years ago. These are the two photos that told me "hey, I could own a Sepia T" Echoing George's comments above this car shows itself quite well in a more stock configuration.
    That is John Montmorency's former car. I have a picture of that car as my screen saver. The color in the pictures posted do not reflect the true Sepia Brown that John's car is. By the way, I had the pleasure of flying John's stunning Staggerwing.

    Regards

    Jim

  5. #15
    Senior Member Per Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Avon Lake, Ohio
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Breazeale View Post
    The color in the pictures posted do not reflect the true Sepia Brown that John's car is.
    Regards

    Jim
    Sepia is best photographed in the sunlight, IMHO.
    Per Schroeder

  6. #16
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,875
    It may be the color, it may be the interior. But most likely it is the fact that whenever you modify a car you reduce the available market to buyers looking for the same choices you made. Stock will always be the biggest market. There are formulations which have been market tested and have appeal. But even those can fade as do fashions.
    Unsolicited advice, I could not get all the way through your ad, too long, too much. Brief description and let the car speak for itself, interested parties will contact you for more detail.
    65 356SC Dolphin Gray
    66 912 Green
    69 911E Tangerine
    72 911T GP White
    72 911T Aubergine
    72 911T Lilac
    72 911S Black (voodoo)
    86 911 GP White Targa (now sons)
    90 964C4 Black Targa
    94 964C2 Black Coupe
    08 GT3 Speed Yellow

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,721
    Quote Originally Posted by bdladd View Post
    Jim, that must have been an amazing experience to fly that plane!

    Thanks for filling in the gaps on the Sepia 72 T ownership, I remember reading about how the T was set up when it was on the website for sale and should have jumped on that one, beautiful example.

    Not to hi-jack this thread too badly but in my mind the two most amazing pieces of transportation designed to date are 1) the 911 and 2) the Beech Staggerwing first introduced in 1932. Just 29 years after the Wright Brothers first flight the Staggerwing was introduced, 450 hp radial engine and 202 mph cruising speed. Pretty amazing aeronautical engineering to be developed in the Depression era.

    Bruce Ladd



    Specifications (Beech Model D17S)
    Beechcraft Model 17DS was designated YC-43 by the US Army Air Corps and used as liaison aircraft for the US Air Attachés in London, Paris and Rome

    Data from Jane's Fighting Aircraft of World War II[18]

    General characteristics

    Crew: one
    Capacity: three passengers
    Payload: 125 lb (56.7 kg) of baggage
    Length: 26 ft 10 in (8.18 m)
    Wingspan: 32 ft (9.75 m)
    Height: 8 ft (2.44 m)
    Wing area: 296.5 ft² (27.55 m²)
    Empty weight: 2,540 lb (1,150 kg)
    Loaded weight: 4,250 lb (1,930 kg)
    Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney R-985-AN-1 "Wasp Junior" radial engine, 450 hp (340 kW) at 2,300 rpm

    Performance

    Maximum speed: 212 mph (184 knots, 341 km/h)
    Cruise speed: 202 mph (176 knots, 325 (km/h)
    Landing speed: 45 mph (39 knots, 72 km/h))
    Range: 582 nm (670 mi, 1,078 km)
    Service ceiling: 25,000 ft (7,600 m)
    Rate of climb: 1,500 ft/min (7.6 m/s)
    Wing loading: 14.3 lb/ft² (70.0 kg/m²)
    Power/mass: 9.44 lb/hp (5.68 kg/kW)
    I can talk about airplanes for hours. That flight was a thrill for me. The staggerwing cruised at just about the same speed as the B36TC that I was flying at the time, albiet the fuel burn was significantly higher. The Staggerwing has amazing performance given it's age. It rivaled many fighters of the same era. It has been labeled as the first real Corporate Aircraft. Anyone that considered John's 72T for purchase and passed on it, screwed up!

    Ciao

    Jim

  8. #18
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,762

    Thumbs up

    Hey Jim,

    On my annual Thanksgiving trip up to Chico CA. in 2005 I looked in on old man Cruces, of Cruces restoration and sales, and he had almost all of one in the shop think'n about trying to put it back together..... Not sure if the old Cruces is still with us, or if the Stagger still exists...

    Forget golf.... now this would be a project..............

    - 2005
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  9. #19
    Just to help get back on topic; a few random Sepia 911 images . . . the color looks different from shot to shot.

    Name:  sepia 1a.jpg
Views: 189
Size:  187.7 KB



    Name:  IMG_20130803_101310_536.jpg
Views: 177
Size:  112.6 KB

    Name:  73_911S_Coupe_Brown.jpg
Views: 179
Size:  205.1 KB
    Doug Dill

    1973 911E Coupe
    PCA #1987109761
    Early 911S Registry #548

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.