Results 1 to 10 of 1088

Thread: Ten Fifty-nine

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,663

    Lighter

    Here are the measured weights relating to the Scheel + bits

    Seat = 12.2 lbs/5.6 kg
    Sliders = 5.4 lbs/2.5 kg
    Headrest = 4.2 lbs/1.9 kg

    Still need to add the bracket that attaches everything to the car.

    Seat is very comfortable, out of the car, at least --- butt fits, hips+thighs, too, backrest angle seems OK, supports all the way up. Have NOT tried the add-on head-rest, yet. Real curious to see what the final height in the car is --- head is up close to the liner now, and I feel like I need to crouch a bit to clear+see . . .

    Seat feels light, as well --- and kinda ‘springy.’

    Been doing some reading of old threads and came across this in a post by John Rice . . .

    . . . most of the Recaro seats are HEAVY. If you want a genuine sports purpose seat for a really light car you should be trying to find an early Scheel bucket which weighs less than 1/2. Of course, they don't hold up over the years either. That is one reason the market is mostly Recaro. Built like a tank. There aren't many Scheels left . . .


    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ly-Seats/page3

    Mr Rice’s comments struck me, bringing up something that’s been in the back of my mind . . . about this Scheel, where it came from, and why was it out of a car?

    I think that people pull parts off of cars for two reasons, mainly. One --- it’s broken. Or Two --- they found something better. Since this seat was worn, not broken, with its original-type late-60s-vintage construction/materials, still intact, I’m thinking this seat, along with the funky sliders --- crudely cut-down prior to being fit, from Gerrit’s observations . . . were replaced by something better, then discarded.

    'Course, I'll never know exactly what happened, or why . . . . but one comment that Mr Rice made, that . . . ‘they don’t hold up over the years’ --- stuck with me.

    The Scheel is light --- sure . . . but also ‘springy,’ a polite way of saying . . . flimsy, built to be light --- NOT to last. And I doubt that I’ll ever get past any Tech Inspect, and into any track event, with this little fiberglass potato-chip-of-a-seat . . . which, I’m thinking, was what might have gotten this particular bit side-lined, in the 1st place.

    The World's moved on a LOT since this seat, and 1059, first came onto the scene. And as much as I treasure/esteem Old Stuff, the fact is . . . a lot of this stuff isn’t safe by modern (and maybe ANY) standards . . . something I’ll be keeping in mind the next time I go diving into a corner, pushing hard on the brakes . . . . or just driving in traffic.

    Rick


    PS Fire extinguisher's handy, Everybody? --- yes?
    Last edited by LongRanger; 12-09-2011 at 03:56 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Nürburgring OGP 2103 - fifty years of the 911
    By 911T1971 in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 12:49 PM
  2. 'Fifty Years of 911' . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 07-24-2013, 12:37 PM
  3. Need An Early 911 (First Fifty 901's) Wiring Diagram
    By 69S-S/R in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-16-2013, 07:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.